Inspiration Porn
Stella Young coined the phrase inspiration porn in an ABC
article in 2012, “Inspiration porn is an image of a person with a disability,
often a kid, doing something completely ordinary - like playing, or talking, or
running, or drawing a picture, or hitting a tennis ball - carrying a caption
like "your excuse is invalid" or "before you quit, try,” as she
tackles what the problem is with people becoming inspired or saying that
disabled people just aren’t trying hard enough to overcome their problems. These
comments are usually made without taking into account the idea that society may
be the problem and not the disabled person’s inability to motivate themselves
intrinsically. Young points out that inspiration porn exists for non-disabled
people to compare themselves to and think, “Well, at least, I’m not that person…
I’m not that bad off compared to them…” All of these examples are endless are
examples of inspiration porn and the root to how an able-bodied society
benefits from them. Young claims, “In this way, these modified images
exceptionalise and objectify those of us they claim to represent. It's no
coincidence that these genuinely adorable disabled kids in these images are
never named: it doesn't matter what their names are, they're just there as
objects of inspiration,” because at its core this concept is meant to objectify
disabled people for the emotional betterment and sense of peace of an able-bodied
person. This form of objectification is no different from the photos and adds
of women meant to sexually excite and please men. This is also determinantal
because it completely eliminates the idea that these children have real lives
and are not broken individuals. She expresses her frustration, “My everyday
life in which I do exactly the same things as everyone else should not inspire
people, and yet I am constantly congratulated by strangers for simply existing.
It happened twice last week.” The lives of disabled people should not be
considered inspirational because the everyday lives of people are not considered
inspirational. It is not an inspiration to exist. It’s an insult to those who
live with disabilities and it continues to make them feel as though do not
truly belong in communities.
Inspiration porn always showcases simple everyday
activities that we all do… running, walking, smiling, eating… but no one
congratulates the average-everyday-Joe for accomplishing this because it is a
normal part of our functioning lives. It does not courage to live life and to
adapt to activities. It is not meant to be inspirational if a child adapts to
painting with her mouth because she doesn’t have hands. That’s how she has
learned to enjoy painting. Her painting should be commended, but not the act
itself because no one ever went up to Picasso and said, “Great job at painting
the painting.” No, people complemented the work and not the effort. That’s the
different between how people perceive able-bodied and disabled people. Young
says,“By far the most disabling thing in my life is the physical environment.
It dictates what I can and can't do every day. But if Hamilton is to be
believed, I should just be able to smile at an inaccessible entrance to a
building long enough and it will magically turn into a ramp. I can make
accessible toilets appear where none existed before, simply by radiating a
positive attitude. I can simply turn that frown upside down in the face of a
flight of stairs with no lift in sight. Problem solved, right?” At its core inspiration
porn is a tool for ableism. It shames people with disabilities. It doesn’t
allow them to overcome societal handicaps, but says, “You can do it if you believe
hard enough.” This mantra does not inspire the disable, put continues to leave
them powerless to overcoming societal constructs and everyday architecture that
isn’t accessible. Her concluding concept reveals her overall message, “Our
attitude is just not positive enough. It's our fault. Not to mention what it
means for people whose disabilities are not visible, like people with chronic
or mental illness, who often battle the assumption that it's all about attitude. And we're not
allowed to be angry and upset, because then we'd be "bad" disabled
people. We wouldn't be doing our very best to "overcome" our
disabilities.”
Inspiration porn affects our students in more ways than one.
It’s important that we do not glorify people with disabilities for overcoming their
disabilities, but for doing good with society. For example, if you are teaching
a lesson on Helen Keller it is probably best not to focus on how she had to overcome
being deaf and blind because her life was so hard (yes, it’s important to
mention), but she also was a writer, gave lectures, political activist, and
founder of Helen Keller International which was devoted to researching vision,
health, and nutrition. She was an inspirational person not because she was deaf
and blind, but because she did many amazing things her life that has impacted
millions of people since then. That’s the difference and it’s an important thing
to distinguish when teaching a class.
Works Cited:
Young, Stella, and
ABC. “We're Not Here for Your Inspiration.” ABC News, Australian
Broadcasting Corporation, 3 July 2012, www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-03/young-inspiration-porn/4107006.
Comments
Post a Comment